Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52200/44.A.YQ2116KBKeywords:
Modern Movement, Modern architecture, Modern housingAbstract
Sustainability is now replacing Modernism as the main discourse for socio–economic, technological, architectural and urban development. However, the architectural legacy of Modernism remains an inherent part of our built environment. While some tenets of Modernism align with principles of sustainable design, many are in conflict, thus creating both a tension and an opportunity for creative reinvention of existing buildings and neighborhoods. Greening Manhattan’s Modernist Legacy was a seminar taught at Cornell University’s school of architecture that investigated these questions. The seminar explored an analytical approach to retrofitting Modernbuildings that prioritized environmental responsibility while critically reinterpreting the Modern aesthetic.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Ilana Judah, Daniel Kaplan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Plaudit
References
Prudon, Theodore H.M., Preservation of Modern Architecture, Hoboken, NJ, Wiley, 2008.
Loper, Joe, Ungar, Lowell, et al. Building on Success: Policies to Reduce Energy Waste in Buildings, Washington, Alliance to Save Energy, 2005.
Bernstein, Harvey, Green Building Retrofit and Renovation Report, New York, McGraw Hill Construction, 2009.
Ayaz, Engin and Yang, “Zero Carbon Isn’t Really Zero: Why Embodied Carbon in Materials Can’t Be Ignored”, Design Intelligence, Norcross GA, September 2009.
PlaNYC progress report 2010, New York City, City of New York, 2010
ASHRAE Standard 90.1–2007 – Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low Rise Residential Buildings, Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 2007.
Carmody, John, et al. Window Systems for High Performance Buildings, New York, NY, Norton, 2004.
Kwok, Alison and Walter T. Grondzik, The Green Studio Handbook, Oxford, UK, Elsevier, 2007.