A global exploration of local Docomomo Inventories
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.69.09Keywords:
built heritage, DOCOMOMO, documentation, modern architecture, systematic reviewAbstract
The Modern Movement encompasses a diverse collection of both iconic and ordinary treasures of architecture worldwide, among which some are safeguarded with respect to their values, while others were demolished, have undergone alterations, neglect, or lack of maintenance and preservation over time. Docomomo has been playing a pivotal role in documenting and safeguarding significant architectural works of the 20th century. Its National and Regional Working Parties (WPs), spread across the globe, have diligently compiled archives of photographs, drawings, historical records, and research materials related to Modern Movement architecture, town planning and landscape design. However, the decentralized nature of these archives poses challenges in terms of accessibility, coordination, and attaining a more comprehensive record of the Modern Movement with a global perspective. Therefore, this study undertakes the explorative task of compiling data from these separate online-available archives of the WPs to attain a broader overview of the documented objects of Modern Movement architecture on a global-scale. The collected data is analyzed to identify patterns, trends, and influential architects and to elaborate on the potential factors contributing to the current status. The study involves analysis of the predominant format of building use/function among documented architectural works, examination of the geographical and chronological coverage of available lists, and the distribution of intervention status within the inventory. These aspects provide valuable insights into the functional diversity, geographic spread, and preservation status of architectural works documented in the dispersed archives. This study also facilitates comparative studies between different regions and countries, shedding light on the shared characteristics and unique contributions of the Modern Movement across diverse cultural contexts. The results help identify trends, gaps, and areas of focus for future research and documentation efforts, ensuring the holistic appreciation of architectural works, and contributing to the scholarly understanding and preservation of this modern heritage.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Meric Altintas Kaptan, Aslıhan Ünlü, Uta Pottgiesser
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Plaudit
References
BRONSON, S. D., & JESTER, T. C. (1997). Conserving the Built Heritage of the Modern Era: Recent Developments and Ongoing Challenges. APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology, 28(4), pp. 4–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1504588.
HENKET, H.J., & DE JONGE, W. (1989, August). Newsletter 1.
https://docomomojournal.com/index.php/journal/issue/view/52/25.
MARSDEN, S., & SPEARRITT, P. (2021). The Twentieth-Century Historic Thematic Framework: A Tool for Assessing Heritage Places. With contributions from Leo Schmidt, Sheridan Burke, Gail Ostergren, Jeff Cody, and Chandler McCoy. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10020/gci_pubs_historic_thematic_framework_tool.
SHARP, D., & COOKE, C. (2000). The Modern Movement in Architecture: Selections from the Docomomo Registers. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.