A mass residential building in Yerevan with an added top floor and individually glazed balconies. © M. Karaselnikova, 2022.
Utilitarian heritage

Questioning current Debate on Socialist Mass Housing in Moldova, Armenia, and Uzbekistan

Authors

Additional Files

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.68.05

Keywords:

mass housing, urban renewal, post-socialism, Soviet legacy, housing heritage

Abstract

While modern heritage is often discussed as a critical resource for sustainable urban and social development, the future of such housing is often limited not by technical but rather by cultural, historical, or socio-economic constraints. In cities with a socialist past, mass housing provided individual apartments for a number of Soviet families and tended to create particular spatial qualities. However, with the collapse of the socialist system, attitudes towards such housing began to transform. This paper is a reflection on the range of perceptions of this heritage, attitudes towards it, and difficulties in shaping contextually informed renewal policy approaches. To what extent do traumatic experiences of the past and the rational use of resources in the present mutually influence each other? This article introduces the controversial debate based on the cases of three former socialist countries: Moldova, Armenia, and Uzbekistan. On the one hand, the ubiquity of mass housing in post-socialist countries fostered tolerance for such a typology. On the other hand, large housing estates are a constant reminder of the traumatic experience of the socialist experiment. This essay discusses the present and the future of large residential estates based on reports, policies, media, and collected expert interviews on approaches to working with mass housing areas. Together, the three contributions and joint reflections attempt to add to the debate about the past, present, and future of middle-class mass housing in various social, cultural, and political conditions.

How to Cite

Sapunova, M., & Borushkina, S. (2023). Utilitarian heritage: Questioning current Debate on Socialist Mass Housing in Moldova, Armenia, and Uzbekistan. Docomomo Journal, (68), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.68.05

Published

2023-09-01

Plaudit

Author Biographies

Marina Sapunova, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

Is research assistant and a Ph.D. candidate at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, and co-founder of MÊTRE—an investigative documentary project about housing and urban regeneration. She has a background in urban planning, teaching, and research within cross-disciplinary teams and self-initiated projects. Her research interests include urban governance, urban planning, zoning legislation, housing and property policy, and its (post)-socialist transformation.

Sofia Borushkina, Politecnico di Milano

Is a Ph.D. candidate at the Politecnico di Milano and a recognized student at the University of Oxford. She has a background in urban planning and economics. Her research focuses on urban and regional policy, urban planning, housing, and urban governance. She is a member of the MCMH-EU Working Group.

References

ANDRUSZ, G. D. (1990). Housing and urban development in the USSR (Repr). Macmillan.

AXENTI, M. (2017). Urban Transformations as an Ideological Tool of Political Regimes: The Case of the Chisinau City Centre. Ritualizing the City: Collective Performances as Aspects of Urban Construction from Constantine to Mao/Edited by Ivan Foletti and Adrien Palladino. Roma: Viella, 121–137.

BAGHDASARYAN, G. (2019, December 13). Northern Avenue or social housing? EV Consulting. https://evconsulting.com/northern-avenue-or-social-housing/ Accessed 07.01.2023

CAŞU, I. (2015). Moldova under the Soviet Communist Regime: History and Memory. In V. Tismaneanu & B. C. Iacob (Eds.), Remembrance, History, and Justice (NED-New edition, 1, pp. 347–372). Central European University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7829/j.ctt19z399m.17

CUJBĂ, V., Sîrbu, R., & Ţîţu, P. (2020). The efficiency of applying the effective age method for locative buildings evaluation in the Republic of Moldova. Învăţământ Superior: Tradiţii, Valori, Perspective, 1, 117–120.

DADABAEV, T. (2013). Community Life, Memory and a Changing Nature of Mahalla Identity in Uzbekistan. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 4(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2013.03.008

DRĖMAITĖ, M. (2017). Baltic modernism: Architecture and housing in Soviet Lithuania (D. Sužiedėlis, Trans.). DOM Publishers.

DRĖMAITĖ, M. (2019). The Exceptional Design of Large Housing Estates in the Baltic Countries. In D. B. Hess & T. Tammaru (Eds.), Housing Estates in the Baltic Countries: The Legacy of Central Planning in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (pp. 71–93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23392-1_4

EROFEEV, N. (2019). The I-464 Housing Delivery System: A Tool for Urban Modernisation in the Socialist World and Beyond. Fabrications, 29(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2019.1611255

GLENDINNING, M. (2021). Mass housing: Modern architecture and state power-a global history. Bloomsbury Visual Arts.

GRIGORYAN, E., & Margaryan, S. (2018, August 20). Memory Politics: The Post-Soviet Memory Landscape in Yerevan. Caucasus Edition. https://caucasusedition.net/memory-politics-the-post-soviet-memory-landscape-in-yerevan/

HERFERT, G., Neugebauer, C. S., & Smigiel, C. (2013). Living in Residential Satisfaction? Insights from Large-Scale Housing Estates in Central and Eastern Europe. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 104(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2012.00727.x

HESS, D. B., & Tammaru, T. (Eds.). (2019). Housing Estates in the Baltic Countries: The Legacy of Central Planning in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23392-1

HESS, D. B., Tammaru, T., & van Ham, M. (Eds.). (2018). Housing Estates in Europe: Poverty, Ethnic Segregation and Policy Challenges. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5

HUTSON, N. (2019). Social housing with a human face: Conserving Moscow’s Soviet era housing legacy. In Routledge Companion to Global Heritage Conservation. Routledge.

ILIN, V. (2022, November 29). The Military Destruction of Late Soviet Urban Space in Ukraine and the Demise of the Soviet Man [Billet]. TRAFO – Blog for Transregional Research. https://trafo.hypotheses.org/40215

IVANOV, A. (2020). Armenian City of Gyumri as a Phenomenon of Living Vernacular Urban Environment. 167–174.

JACOBS, K. (2001). Historical Perspectives and Methodologies: Their Relevance for Housing Studies? Housing, Theory and Society, 18(3–4), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090152770492

JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY. (2012). The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia. Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS). https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12086054_01.pdf

LEETMAA, K., Tammaru, T., & Hess, D. B. (2015). Preferences Toward Neighbor Ethnicity and Affluence: Evidence from an Inherited Dual Ethnic Context in Post-Soviet Tartu, Estonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(1), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.962973

MEUSER, P. (2016). Seismic Modernism: Architecture and Housing in Soviet Tashkent. DOM publishers.

MEUSER, P., & Zadorin, D. (2015). Towards a typology of Soviet mass housing: Prefabrication in the USSR 1955-1991 (C. Knowles, Trans.). DOM Publishers.

MONCLÚS, J., & Díez Medina, C. (2016). Modernist housing estates in European cities of the Western and Eastern Blocs. Planning Perspectives, 31(4), 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2015.1102642

PILIPENKO I.V. The Dynamics of the Housing Construction in the Republics of the USSR in the 1920s–1980s. Part 3. Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya = Journal of Economic History & History of Economics, 2022, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 219–255. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17150/2308-2488.2022.23(2).219-255.

PILOSYAN, H.-H. (2020, December 28). Social Housing for Armenia: Medium. https://heghinepilosyan.medium.com/social-housing-for-armenia-d334af111ba6 Accessed 07.01.2023

PRIMĂRIA MUNICIPIULUI CHIŞINAU. (2010). Concepţia Reformei Gestiunii Blocurilor De Locuinţe În Oraşul Chişinău. https://www.chisinau.md/public/files/strategice/Conceptia_Reformei_Gestiunii_Blocurilor_de_Locuinte_in_Chisi.pdf

ROMANOVA, A. (2021). Political Dynamics of Urban Hodonyms: A Case of Chisinau, Moldova. Urbana, 22, 133.

ROWLANDS, R., Musterd, S., & Kempen, R. van (Eds.). (2019). Mass housing in Europe multiple faces of development, change and response. Palgrave Macmillan.

SAFARYAN, A. Y., & Safaryan, Y. A. (2020). Housing architecture of Yerevan. Typology, Forecast. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 913, No. 3, p. 032015). IOP Publishing.

SARGSYAN, T. (2013). Residential environmental conditions on housing estates in Yerevan. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 62(1), Article 1.

SHEVCHENKO, L. (2022). Mass housing in Ukraine in the second half of the 20th century. docomomo journal, (67), 72-78.

SÎRBU, R., & Cujbă, V. (2022). Housing quality in the Republic of Moldova. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Administratio Locorum, 21(1), 139–151.

SNOPEK, K. (2015). Belyayevo forever: A Soviet microrayon on its way to the UNESCO list. Dom Publishers; Strelka Institute. http://d-nb.info/1071727958/04

STATISTICAL COMMITTEE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA. (2021). Housing stock and communal economy in Armenia in 2020 [բնակարանային ֆոնդը և կոմունալ տնտեսությունը 2020թ]. https://armstat.am/file/article/bnakfond_2021_1.pdf

STEPHENS, M. (2005). A critical analysis of housing finance reform in a ’super’ home-ownership state: The case of Armenia. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1795–1815.

STEPHENS, M., Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2015). Post-Socialist Housing Systems in Europe: Housing Welfare Regimes by Default? Housing Studies, 30(8), 1210–1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1013090

TREIJA, S., & Bratuškins, U. (2019). Socialist Ideals and Physical Reality: Large Housing Estates in Riga, Latvia (pp. 161–180). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23392-1_8

TSYRYAPKINA, Y. N. (2020). Attitudes Towards the Socialism Era in Post-Soviet Uzbekistan: A Study of Historical Memory. Historical Courier., 5(13).

UNECE. (2002). Country profiles on the housing sector—Republic of Moldova.

UNECE. (2015). Country Profiles on Housing and Land Management—Uzbekistan.

UNECE. (2017). Country Profiles on Housing and Land Management—Republic of Armenia.

VAN ASSCHE, K., & Salukvadze, J. (2012). Tbilisi: Urban transformation and role transformation in the post-Soviet metropolis. In Remaking Metropolis (pp. 86–102). Routledge.

ГИНСАРЬ, Виктория Николаевна, ИСИЧКО, Евгений (2009). Характеристика существующей застройки г. Кишинева для последующей оценки сейсмического риска. [GINSAR, Viktoriya Nikolayevna, ISICHKO, Yevgeniy. Kharakteristika sushchestvuyushchey zastroyki g. Kishineva dlya posleduyushchey otsenki seysmicheskogo riska] Buletinul Institutului de Geologie şi Seismologie al AŞM, (2), 12-23. (in Russian)

АЗАТЯН, Карен Рубенович (2016). Жилищная архитектура Еревана в XX в. Выявление основных этапов развития планировочной структуры жилой ячейки. [Azatyan Karen Rubenovich, Zhilishchnaya arkhitektura Erevana v XX v. Vyyavlenie osnovnykh etapov razvitiya planirovochnoy struktury zhiloy yacheyki] Vestnik MGSU, (5), 18-27, Moscow. (in Russian)

МЕЕРОВИЧ, Марк Григорьевич (2008). Наказание жилищем: Жилищная политика в СССР как средство управления людьми. 1917–1937. [Meerovich, Mark Grigorevich. Nakazanie zhilishchem: zhilishchnaia politika v SSSR kak sredstvo upravleniia liudmi. 1917-1937], Moscow 2008 (in Russian)