Romanian Mass Housing Public Space as a Playground in the Collective Memory
Additional Files
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.68.06Keywords:
socialist mass-housing, uniformity, collective memory, spontaneity, playgroundAbstract
The territorial systematization in Romania in the second half of the twentieth century has profoundly influenced the morphology of the current urban fabric, due to the pace of construction imposed by the socialist regime and related to politically forced industrialization and urbanization, thus contributing to an urban society sensitive to the subject. This paper addresses the ways in which the public space, resulting from the construction of socialist mass housing, was used, questioning how public space can be (re)gained for today’s communities by understanding the disparity between the original, ordered socialist vision of housing and more informal appropriation patterns. The governmental approach to the urban development of socialist mass housing resulted in the occurrence of interstitial spaces which, having been of low development priority, were reclaimed by the nearby inhabitants, becoming free places for everyone and no one, territories that generated infinite possibilities for appropriation. Even though socialist mass housing developments were (and still are) associated with a sense of constraint, this situation generated the spontaneity with which inhabitants used the public space. In Romania, in the collective memory of generations, the iconic image of the space between the blocks is that of children playing and people socializing between grey buildings. With the fall of the communist regime, the responsibility of maintaining the buildings and the public space in-between was transferred to the new owners by selling the previously state-owned apartments to the population; in Romania, about 96% of homes are now privately owned. At a time when Romanian cities are facing a lack of quality public spaces, the in-between space in the mass housing neighborhoods has become a large parking area. Addressing how the public space can be (re)used must involve a clear understanding of past practices to generate context-sensitive reactions.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Romeo Emanuel Cuc
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Plaudit
References
BICIUȘCĂ, F. (2005). Experimentul Cățelu [The Cățelu Experiment], Bucharest: LiterNet.
BLAJOVICI, P. (1971). Unele probleme actuale ale arhitecturii și urbanismului din țara noastră [Some current issues of architecture and urban planning in our country]. Arhitectura 1 (128), pp. 2-3
CEAUȘESCU, N. (1971). Cuvântarea Tovarășului Nicolae Ceaușescu la cea de-a III-a Conferință a Uniunii Arhitecților din Republica Socialistă România 4-5 martie 1971 [Comrade Nicolae Ceaușescu’s speech at the 3rd Conference of the Union of Architects from the Socialist Republic of Romania March 4-5, 1971]. In Arhitectura 2 (129), pp.3-8
CRISTEA, D., SANDU, A. (1982). Rezolvări obișnuite prilejuite de un detaliu de sistematizare obișnuit [Common solutions occasioned by a common systematization detail]. In Arhitectura 1 (194), pp. 34-36
DERER, P. (1972). Reflecții privind loisir-ul cotidian [Reflections on everyday leisure]. In Arhitectura 2 (135), pp. 9-11
DERER, P. (1982). Luări de cuvând la plenara Uniunii Arhitecților – Calitatea locuinței [Speeches at the Plenary Session of the Union of Architects - Quality of housing]. In Arhitectura 2 (195), pp. 31-32
FLORIAN, A. (1963). Elemente de dotare a spațiilor de joc pentru copii în ansamblurile de locuințe [Equipment for children’s play areas in residential complexes]. Arhitectura R.P.R. 4 (83), pp. 40-45.
GĂVOZDEA, I. (1969). Orientarea dezvoltării producției de prefabricate în perioada 1971-1975 [Orientation of the development of the production of prefabs in the period 1971-1975]. Arhitectura 6(121), pp. 17-22.
GHELMAN, R. (1966). Reflecții pe marginea unui nou ansamblu de locuințe: cartierul Jiului București [Reflections on the edge of a new housing complex: the Jiului neighborhood of Bucharest]. In Arhitectura 2-3 (99-100), pp. 30-39.
GHEORGHIU-DEJ, G. (1962). Din Raportul prezentat la Sesiunea extraordinară a Marii Adunări Naţionale din 27 aprilie1962 [From the Report presented at the Extraordinary Session of the Great National Assembly of April 27, 1962]. In Arhitectura R.P.R. 2 (75), p. 1.
GUSTAV, G. 1962. Influența noilor forme colective de viață asupra trăsăturilor orașului socialist [The influence of the new collective forms of life on the features of the socialist city]. In Arhitectura R.P.R. 2 (75), 1962, pp. 2-5.
GUSTAV, G. (1969). Necesități obiective ale etapei actuale [Objective needs of the current stage]. In Arhitectura 2 (117), pp. 40-41.
GUSTAV, G., HUSSAR, G. (1963). Un ansamblu arhitectural contemporan în vechea capitală a Moldovei [A contemporary architectural ensemble in the old capital of Moldova]. In Arhitectura R.P.R. 4 (83), pp. 18-19.
HORODINCĂ, R. (1983). Determinarea criteriilor și parametrilor de analiză a detaliilor de sistematizare pentru ansamblurile de locuințe – metodologie pentru un demers multicriterial [Determining the criteria and parameters for the analysis of systematization details for housing complexes – methodology for a multi-criteria approach]. In Arhitectura 1(200), pp. 34-35
LĂZĂRESCU, C. (1974). Valorificarea teritoriului urban [Valorization of the urban territory]. In Arhitectura 3 (147), pp. 17-22.
LĂZĂRESCU, C. (1976). Proiectarea ansamblurilor de locuințe în perioada 1976-1980: studiu întocmit de Catedra de sistematizare a Institutului de arhitectură Ion Mincu din București [The design of housing complexes in the period 1976-1980: study prepared by the Department of Systematization of the Ion Mincu Institute of Architecture in Bucharest]. Arhitectura 3 (160), pp. 9-24
LOCAR, M. (1966). Evoluția construcției de locuințe în Republica Socialistă România [The evolution of housing construction in the Socialist Republic of Romania]. In Arhitectura 4 (101), pp. 18-23.
MIHĂILESCU, V. (2018). Faceți loc! [Make room!] in Mnemonics, o viziune ludică asupra libertății [Mnemonics, a playful vision of freedom]. In Arhitectura 2-3 (674-675), pp. 24-37.
NICULIU, C. (1981). Aspecte actuale în calitatea locuinței [Current aspects in housing quality]. In Arhitectura 6 (193), p. 17.
PETROVICI, N. (2018). Playing around the block – the social forms taken by socialist urbanization. In Cuc, R. (et. al.), Mnemonics – collective memories define our territory, Bucharest: VSP, pp. 19-32.
RADO, K. (1967). Ansamblul de locuințe colective strada Săvinești, Târgu-Mureș [Collective housing Complex, Săvinești street., Târgu-Mureș]. an unpublished document from the archive of the former State Design Institute of Mureș County – project no. 4453/1967.
SEBÉSTYEN, V. (1962). Proiectarea microraioanelor [The design of microdistricts]. In Arhitectura R.P.R. 2 (75), pp. 9-15.
STOIAN, J. (2017). Un japonez a fotografiat Bucureștiul din 1990, când era pierdut între comunism și democrație [A Japanese photographed Bucharest in 1990, when it was lost between communism and democracy]. https://www.vice.com/ro/article/nz9zzb/bucuresti-foto-1990 Accessed Jan. 11, 2023.
STROE, M. (2015). Locuirea între proiect şi decizie politică: România 1954-1966 [Housing, between Design and Political Decision-making: Romania, 1954-1966]. Bucharest: Simetria.
URSU, S. (1976). Conceptul de flexibilitate a spațiului locuinței [The concept of home space flexibility]. In Arhitectura 2(159), pp. 12-14.
VAIS, D. (2020). Type Projects as Tools: Housing Type Design in Communist Romania. In Architectural Histories, 8(1): 10, pp. 1–17, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ah.321 .
ZAHARIADE, A. M. (2009). Simptome de tranziție [Transitional symptoms], Bucharest: Arhitext.
ZAHARIADE, A. M. (2011). Arhitectura în proiectul comunist. România 1944-1989 – Architecture in the communist project. Romania 1944-1989. Bucharest: Simetria. (In Romanian and English).
