New Belgrade: past-present-future, and the future that never came

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52200/59.A.D8RTDTPT

Keywords:

Modern Movement, Modern architecture, Modern housing

Abstract

It was an event that rarely happens in this part of the world: the construction of a brand-new capital city in a country which was not famous for its achievements in city building. Furthermore, it was in a country ravaged by WWII, rural and mostly agricultural, with modest industrial capacities. Today, 70 years after the beginning of its construction, New Belgrade is still one of the most contentious topics of architecture and urban planning in Serbia. It is the most beloved and the most hated, biggest success story and biggest failure, most beautiful and ugliest architecture of the city — all at the same time. It is not just a question of contested beauty: like many other post-war cities based on the Athens Charter, New Belgrade is a vast infrastructurally equipped urban territory, soaked in conflicted interests and interpretations of its past and its future. As we approach the saturation point of its available construction land — at least per original and many consecutive plans — the question of its future development, its reconstruction and/or restoration is looming out of every document and every conversation about New Belgrade.

How to Cite

Jovanović, J. (2018). New Belgrade: past-present-future, and the future that never came. Docomomo Journal, (59), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.52200/59.A.D8RTDTPT

Published

2018-11-01

Author Biography

Jelica Jovanović, TU Wien

Independent researcher, PhD student of the University of Technology, Vienna. Founder and member of Grupa Arhitekata and docomomo Serbia. Coordinator of regional projects Unfinished Modernisations and (In)appropriate Monuments. Curatorial assistant of MoMA’s exhibition Toward a Concrete Utopia: Architecture in Yugoslavia, 1948–1980.

References

Arhitektura urbanizam, n. 2-32, vanredni broj “Budućnost Novog Beograda”, Beograd, Organ Saveza društava arhitekata i Saveza društava urbanista Jugoslavije, 1960, 1965, 1987.

Bilten Energoprojekt, Beograd, Energoprojekt, 1980-1991.

БЛАГОЈЕВИЋ, Љ., Нови Београд, oспорени модернизам. Београд: Завод за уџбенике и наставна средства, Архитектонски факултет Универзитета у Београду, Завод за заштиту споменика културе града Београда, 2007.

Bogdan Bogdanović documentation, Archive of the National Library of Austria.

Historical Archive of Belgrade, Municipality of New Belgrade, technical documentation of the Blocks: 1, 2, 11, 15, 19, 19a, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30, 45, 70, 61, 62, 63, 64.

ЈОВАНОВИЋ, Ј., Елаборат анализе претходно заштићене целине Централна зона Новог Београда Блокови 21, 22 и 23. Урбанистичко – архитектонска анализа, Документација Завода за заштиту споменика културе града Београда, 2014.

KRSTIĆ, Branislav, Atinska povelja i misao arhitekata i urbanista FNRJ 1950-ih, Beograd, Branislav Krstić, 2014.

LE CORBUSIER, Atinska povelja, Beograd, Klub mladih arhitekata, 1965.

LE NORMAND, Brigitte, Designing Tito’s Capital: Urban Planning, Modernism, and Socialism, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2014.

ПЕТРИЧИЋ, Б., Прве урбанистичке реализације (Нови Београд), Годишњак града Београда XXII (Београд), 1975, 219-234.

RADOVIĆ, R., Centralne funkcije i centri (skripta), Beograd, Arhitektonski fakultet u Beogradu, 1972-1976. Simpozijum “Budućnost Novog Beograda”, Beograd, Društvo arhitekata Beograda, 1986.

STOJANOVIĆ, Bratislav, MARTINOVIĆ, Uroš, Beograd 1945-1975 – Urbanizam Arhitektura, Beograd, NIRO Tehnička knjiga, 1978. “Tridesetpet godina izgradnje Novog Beograda”, Izgradnja, n. 11-12/83, Beograd, Savez građevinskih inženjera i tehničara SR Srbije, Savez društava arhitekata Srbije, Savet za građevinarstvo Republičke privredne komore SR Srbije, 1983.

Urbanizam Beograda, n. 25, 58, Beograd, Urbanistički zavod grada Beograda, 1974, 1980.

Komunikacija, n. 25, 26, 27, 28, 40, Beograd, CEP, 1984, 1986.