Keywords:Modern Movement, Modern architecture, Modern housing
The 1945 battle for liberation witnessed the massive decimation of Manila’s urban built-heritage and the irreplaceable treasures of colonial architecture. Despite the seemingly impossible task to resuscitate war ravaged Manila, it rose again. Out of the ashes, modernism provided the opportunity to craft a new architecture for a newly independent nation. Modernism emerged as the period’s architectural symbol of survival and optimism. In a post-colonial cultural milieu, Filipino architects pursued the iconography of national mythology channeled through the pure surfaces and unadorned geometries of modern architecture. They found in modernism a convenient aesthetic modus to denounce the colonial vestiges embodied in the infrastructure of American neoclassicism in pre-war Manila and sought to create new-built environments that conveyed emancipation from the colonial past and celebrate the vernacular forms processed through modernist geometric simplification. Modernism, therefore, was a logical choice, for it provided a progressive image. The Philippines post-independence architecture endeavored to dispense an image that stimulated a national spirit, inspired patriotism, and invoked faith in the unknown future of the national imagination.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2017 Gerard Lico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CABALFIN, Edson, “Modernizing the Native: the Vernacular and the Nation in Philippine Modern Architectures”, Docomomo Journal n. 34 – France-Brazil Round Trip, Paris, Docomomo International, March 2006, 34-41.
FRAMPTON, Kenneth, Modern Architecture: A Critical History, London, Thames and Hudson, 1992 .
KLASSEN, Winand, Architecture in the Philippines: Filipino Building in a Cross-Cultural Context, Cebu City, University of San Carlos Press, 1986.
LICO, Gerard, Arkitekturang Filipino: A History of Architecture and Urbanism in the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, University of the Philippines Press, 2008.
LICO, Gerard, Edifice Complex: Power, Myth and Marcos State Architecture, Quezon City, Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2003.
MANAHAN, Geronimo, Philippine Architecture in the 20th Century, Manila, Kanlungan Foundation, 1994.
PEREZ, Rodrigo, Arkitektura: Essay on the American Colonial and Contemporary Traditions in Philippine Architecture, Manila, Cultural Center of the Philippines, 1994.
PINCHES, Michael, “Modernization and the Quest for Identity: Architectural Form, Squatter Settlements and the New Society in Manila” in LOGAN, William; ASKEW, Marc (ed.), Cultural Identity and Urban Change in Southeast Asia: Interpretative Essays, Victoria, Deakin University Press, 1994, 13-42.
POLITES, Nicholas, The Architecture of Leandro Locsin, New York, Weatherhill Inc., 1977.
VILLANUEVA, D., “Toward a Filipino Architecture”, Sunday Times Magazine, April 6, 1958, 42-45.