Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52200/51.A.XXHURCAOKeywords:
Modern Movement, Modern architecture, Modern housingAbstract
In London, in the context of a shortfall of homes that has achieved the status of “housing crisis”, the replacement of obsolete social housing stock, inherited from the post-war period of mass production, for housing that satisfies the demands of the private market and the need for more sustainable cities is one of the main issues for the 21st century. Robin Hood Gardens’ demolition will become a paradigm for the positions to be taken respecting urban obsolescence. Across London, one can see examples that show how, by the criteria of contemporary urban planning, the domestic and urban potential of much of the post-war social housing stock makes it difficult for the current owner, the local government, to invest in its refurbishment and to keep its status as social housing.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Aranzazu Melon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Plaudit
References
DAVIS, Mike, Más allá de Blade Runner. Control Urbano: la Ecología del Miedo, Barcelona, Virus Editorial, 1992.
EISENMAN, Peter, Eisenman Inside Out: Selected Writings, 1963-1988, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2004.
MONTANER, Josep Maria; MUXI, Zaida, Habitar el Presente. Vivienda en España: Sociedad, Ciudad, Tecnología y Recursos, Madrid, Ministerio de Vivienda de España, 2006.
MUXI, Zaida, La Arquitectura de la Ciudad Global, Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, 2004.
SMITHSON, Alison & Peter, Ordinariness and Light: Urban Theories 1952–1960 and their Application in a Building Project 1963–1970, London, Faber and Faber, 1970.
SMITHSON, Alison & Peter, The Charged Void: Architecture, New York, The Monacelli Press, 2001.
SMITHSON, Alison & Peter, “Collective Design: The Violent Consumer, or Waiting for the Goodies”, Architectural Design, Vol XLIV, No. 5, 1974, 274–279.