Capital Production and Social Equity: Finding Balance in Chinese Cities

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52200/50.A.P1MVWPP2

Keywords:

Modern Movement, Modern architecture, Modern housing

Abstract

China’s massive capital accumulation, economic ascent and wealth production has largely been the result of their rapid urbanization effort. While it is indisputable that the country has largely succeeded in its economic reform efforts given its status as the world’s second largest economy and in that process lifted hundreds of millions of its population out of poverty, it has also, in that process, created severe social inequality and friction. This essay largely argues that Chinese cities are purpose-built financial instruments for capital accumulation, a result of the forces of globalization which could only have happened in sync with the time and space of a global economy. Though highly successful, so far the process has marginalized the objective of social integration into its performative matrix indexing. In this regard China has pursued an exploitive model of market driven urbanization and the resultant morphological and spatial attributes of the Chinese cities, while having achieved spectacular results on many levels, are nevertheless disjunctive. They are commodities of generic sameness that are mass-produced and exhibit the same anesthetizing effects of the spectacle that are ever prevalent in today’s global market production process, product and place. Recognizing that globalization and capitalism are here to stay in the immediate future, it begs the question if China, while having already undertaken extreme economic reform experimentations allowing it to now bask in its temporal success, will be able to leverage its acquired market knowledge and wealth creation to prospectively overcome the incredibly complex challenge of creating equitable cities in the future — ones that balance the demands of capital production on the one hand and social equity on the other — or rather will it sink deeper into the “neoliberal modern society” that it has already become.

How to Cite

Liang, A. (2014). Capital Production and Social Equity: Finding Balance in Chinese Cities. Docomomo Journal, (50), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.52200/50.A.P1MVWPP2

Published

2014-08-01

Issue

Section

Essays

Author Biography

Andrew Liang, University of Southern California

BSc in Architecture, University of Southern California; MSc in Architecture, Columbia University (1994), New York. Principal of the Los Angeles based architectural firm Studio 0.10 founded in 1997. Design/urban theory faculty member at the University of Southern California’s School of Architecture where he was Director of the Asia Architecture and Urbanism Program between 2009 and 2013.

References

BASAR, Shumon; MIESSEN, Markus, Did Someone Say Participate: An Atlas of Spatial Practice, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2006.

BUCHANAN, Mark, “Complexity Management”, Strategy + Business, Issue 34, Spring 2004.

CAMPANELLA, Thomas, The Conrete Dragon: China’s Urban Revolution and What It Means to the World, New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 2008.

COASE, Ronald; WANG, Ning, “How China Became Capitalist”, Cato Policy Report, January/February 2013.

DEBORD, Guy, The Society of the Spectacle, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1995.

HARVEY, David, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, New York, Oxford University Press, 2005.

LEFEBVRE, Henri, The Production of Space, Cambridge, Blackwell Publishers, 1991.

LOGAN, John; MOLOTCH, Harvey, Urban Fortunes, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1987.

MILLER, Tom, China’s Urban Billion: The Story Behind the Biggest Migration in Human History, London, Zed Books, 2012.

REN, Xuefei, Urban China, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2013.

SASSEN, Saskia, “The Global City: Introducing a Concept”, Brown Journal of World Affairs, Vol. 11, No. 2, Winter/Spring 2005.