Keywords:Modern Movement, Modern architecture, Modern housing
Aiton Court, in Johannesburg, is a case study in how heritage and economics clash in economically constrained cities. This iconic and formally innovative Modern apartment block from 1937 is located in an area where the income levels of tenants are now very low. Although the building is protected by legislation, the viability of its restoration is being further tested by a rent boycott. The article covers the building’s history, and questions how to approach its conservation differently, given the strong demand for housing at a cost level that would be excluded by purely market–led gentrification. We propose that locating conservation strategies in relation to the building’s history and to other subsidies aimed at the public good may provide other routes to preserving Aiton Court.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2013 Hannah Le Roux, Brendan Hart, Yasmin Mayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Interviews with Rehana Rawat (2005); Yousof Rawat (2005); Herbert Prins (2005) and Andrew Schaefer (2012)
Development Bank of South Africa, 2013. Green Fund: 2nd request for proposals. D. o. E. Affairs. South Africa, Department of Environmental Affairs.
Herbert, Gilbert, Martienssen and the International Style: The Modern Movement in South African architectur, Cape Town–Rotterdam, AA Balkema, 1975.
Le Corbusier, Le Corbusier et Pierre Jeanneret–Oeuvre complète de 1929–1934, Zurich, H. Girsberger, 1935.
MacDonald, Susan, “Authenticity is More than Skin Deep: Conserving Britain’s Postwar Concrete Architecture”, APT Bulletin 28 (4), 1997, 8.
Republic of South Africa, 1999. National Heritage Resources Act, no 25. G. Gazette.
The Housing Development Agency, 2012. Regenerating a neighbourhood: useful lessons from eKhaya. Case Studies. T. H. D. Agency. Johannesburg, The Housing Development Agency.
The National Treasury, 2004. Urban Renewal Tax Incentive. T. P. Directorate. South Africa, South African Revenue Services.